Copyright © Global Coalition for Sustained Excellence in Food & Health Protection, 2011 and ALL subsequent years: Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s authors and/or owners is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Global Coalition for Sustained Excellence in Food & Health Protection with appropriate and specific reference and/or link to the original content.

Friday 18 December 2015

The Food Safety Certification Debate

This blog post has been moved to the author's eBook.

2 comments:

  1. I agree 100% in relation to #8. We are our own judge for 99% of the time. A third party certification only fulfils the needs of the certifier and those (customers) who hold it as a means to confirm that certain standards have been met. On all other points I am somewhat split in my thinking but may lean slightly more toward for rather than against.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With the mounting evidence, it is tough to argue against the resolve that third party food safety certificates are useless. While the idea of having standards for measuring success is age-old and good, the certification direction is so superficial that it is somewhat fraudulent.

      Delete