The
evolution continues with the Safety, Security and Quality Assurance (SSQA) concept. Why do we need this concept and
where does it fit in the scheme of things? Several areas of key differences are listed: GCSE-Food & Health Protection SSQA.
Here are some of the significant
differences:
There
is another salient difference. GCSE-FHP SSQA does not only require continuing, and direct contributions from all parties; it also directly and actively drives
the engagement of all parties. Through its Participatory Alliance Principles, the SSQA concept actively engages the
entire material supply and utilization chain. It drives continuous improvement processes and loss mitigation actions with strategies for measuring and expanding successful achievements.
Other
Differentiating Key Concepts and Strategies:
The
SSQA system involves strategies that ensure resource-efficient and effective implementation of programs, procedures and actions.These strategies can be represented in this short instructive phrase: "Entice team-mates who care about facts". A brief explanation of the specific strategies is provided as follows:
Entire
Chain Engagement
– otherwise known as “ENTI-CE”
Through the ENTI-CE strategy, SSQA drives the active engagement of the entire material supply, processing,
distribution, product utilization, regulators and assessors chain in the
continuous improvement process with measurable success. ENTI-CE is one of the primary
strategies in the SSQA concept.
Engaging
the entire team with the incorporated Extra Pay Incentive in the tracking of successes (positive internal achievements
and positive consumer feedback) and the contributing factors as part of the
strategy for maintaining continuous improvement action.
Continuing
Analysis of Realized Effectiveness and Efficiencies – “CARE”
CARE involves a review of implemented actions (identified), expended resources
(quantified) and realized benefits (quantified) as part of the Continuous
Improvement Accounting. The CARE strategy drives a continuing commitment to
ensuring resource efficiencies and optimization.
Failure
Analysis and Control Tracking System – “FACTS”
This
SSQA strategy ensures the ongoing failure elimination process through the tracking
and prevention of real time quality control incidents, as well as the tracking and
prevention of the causes of consumer complaints. Note: Positive feedback from
consumers or customers are considered under Team-MATES
DMS-HACCP (HACCP with
consideration given to DMS - Difficult to Manage Situations). A DMS-HACCP program incorporates FACTS that are real to the operation.
Key SSQA
Roles
In the SSQA
model, there are some key universal roles of Assessor (Auditor), Facilitator
and Consultant. The general definitions and differentiation are provided
briefly as follows:
The Assessor:
This is not a
consultant's role but the assessor serves as a provider of technical evaluation
of implemented programs. The Assessor evaluates operations against identified effectiveness
standard in order to establish the level of effectiveness achieved. Where effectiveness is deemed to have been achieved, the assessment process is expected to conclude until another
scheduled assessment. Where the satisfactory effectiveness is not deemed to have been achieved, the program is noted as
having failed that requirement. The Auditor submits a corrective action request
and awaits the corrective action response in order to determine if a satisfactory level of effectiveness has been achieved.
Under the
SSQA model, the emphasis is always on the validity and effectiveness of
implemented programs. In other words, the Assessor’s conclusions about implemented programs are not based merely on the wordings of a written
standard. The persistent frame of reference is the effectiveness of what is evaluated
to mitigate real concerns that are associated with the evaluated item.
This is an implementation
level consultation role. The Facilitator serves as a technical assessment and solution implementation
resource. This is in addition to performing the Assessor’s role. Where systems
are found to be effective the process does not conclude. It loops into the
continuous improvement cycle. Where systems are found to be ineffective, the
operation is noted as having failed in that aspect. The Facilitator conducts the
root cause analysis investigation (with the facility's full involvement) and works with the facility to
assess different available and effective solution options. The Facilitator assists
in the solution implementation & re-assessment through the continuous
improvement loop.
Consultant:
This is the expert
level consultation role. The consultant serves as the technical
solution finding and implementation resource. This is in addition to the
Facilitator’s role. The Consultant is expected to recommend best solution
options and assist the facility in the implementation of recommended solutions. The
Consultant also assists the facility in its continuous improvement initiatives.
SSQA is for food businesses that no longer wish
to continue with food safety cat and mouse games:
Write your story - leave a lasting legacy - Join the SSQADevelopment (SSQA-D) Community – "the SQUAD":
No comments:
Post a Comment