5, 10, 20, years from now, the FDA-FSMA, the Canadian Safe Food for Canadians Act (SFCA) that received its Royal Assent on November 22, 2012, and similar proposals elsewhere will not produce any significant reduction in the number and scope of recalls that we are seeing today. Disappointment awaits us if these initiatives are pursued without serious modifications to address the points listed below and other limiting factors that are implicit in the current proposals. Even from a cursory look at the contents of some of the proposed regulations, enough reasons can be found that support this prediction:
* Many of the rules are too vague (generalized or generic) and leave too much room for confused interpretation, deliberate misinterpretation and manipulation.
* The regulations are driven more by political agendas than by genuine consideration for the consumers.
More reasons can be cited but these alone are sufficient reasons for the prediction that these initiatives will keep the industry busy for sure but will have little to no substantive evidence of success.
Regulatory non-compliance may be deterred to some degree by strict enforcement of rules and punitive measures but the greed for profit is stronger. Unscrupulous players are either driven underground or they are driven into "catch-me-if-you-can" scheming and corner-cutting pre-occupation. These same players may fly flags that say: "Food Safety and Quality Certified". Meanwhile, the scheming continues to the detriment of consumers and honest players in the industry. Perfectly law-abiding players may struggle to pay the costs of inspections and audits that they must be subjected to because of the unscrupulous bandits. It is and will remain a crazy world of superficial accreditation, intimidation, litigation, growing cut-throat competition and enmity among participants if strategies for ensuring genuine collaboration are not urgently pursued.
Also read the post on: Health of Nations.